LZWlaw

spacer
Legal solutions at the click of a button
spacer

   
   

Sickness

Quite often, there is a contractual right to sick pay whereby the employer spells out what the employee is to receive when sick and over what period. In the absence of a contractual provision, employees are entitled to receive Statutory Sick Pay ("SSP") from the employer. The entitlement limit is, generally, 28 weeks in a 3 year period.

The qualifications for SSP are that an employee must:
Have 4 or more consecutive days of sickness (including Sundays and holidays) where he is incapable of doing his work.
Notify the absence to his employer.
Supply evidence of incapacity (such as self-certificate or doctor's certificate).

There are a number of excluded employees who are not entitled to receive SSP. These include employees over the age of 65 on the first day of sickness, those taken on for a specified period of no more than 3 months and employees who are pregnant and go off sick during the maternity pay period. This is not an exhaustive list.

Any contractual remuneration paid to an employee for a day of sickness is to be offset against the SSP due for the same day. An employer can never pay the employee an amount in total which is less than the SSP due.

What happens where an employer dismisses an employee as a result of the employee's sickness?
Where there are cases of the employee's long term ill-health, which makes the future performance of the contract of employment impossible, the contract may be considered to have been "frustrated" and the employee will in these circumstances be deemed not to have been dismissed. This however is extremely rare.

If an employer is to safeguard itself against a claim for unfair dismissal, an employer should go to some length to find our the current medical position which would involve consultation with the employee's medical advisors and possibly have an employee examined. If the employer can show that it has taken these necessary steps and has properly informed itself of the state of employee's state of health and prognosis and following such prognosis the employer makes a perfectly reasonable decision to dismiss the employee, the employer is likely to have little come back.

Where the sickness consists of persistent short absences by unconnected minor ailments, the employee should ideally be told what level of attendance he is expected to attain and that dismissal may follow if there is no sufficient improvement. An employer should be careful to adhere to the correct disciplinary procedures (such as warnings) as a Tribunal could well find that a dismissal is unfair on procedural grounds, even if ultimately, the same decision would have been made had the correct procedures been followed.

The Tribunal will also consider whether the ill-health or sickness was caused by the employer's actions. This may well have a bearing on whether the ultimate decision to dismiss is deemed to be fair or unfair.

Other aspects of UK employment law for employees include:

 
Send us your enquiry

 

 


Philip Landau
email Philip
profile

Joy Hutchinson
email Joy

 

 

Summary of UK employment law for employees

Fast track advice on compromise agreements

 

 

 

 

BUSINESS
EMPLOYMENT
ENFRANCHISEMENT
FAMILY

IMMIGRATION

INSOLVENCY
LICENSING
LITIGATION
arrow PROPERTY
  arrow RESIDENTIAL
  arrow COMMERCIAL
  arrow AUCTION LEGAL
SERVICE
  arrow RAPID ONLINE
LEASE CHECKER
WILLS & PROBATE

 

 
         
                 
back | top of the page
 
    Landau Zeffertt Weir Solicitors
10 Bickels Yard, 151-153 Bermondsey Street,
spacerLondon Bridge, London SE1 3HA
T: 020 7357 9494 F: 020 7357 9696 E: info@lzwlaw.co.uk